Enlightenment is not for the "me" (transcribed)

Hi Everyone,

I thought you might enjoy the written transcription of this video.
To see the original video, go into the Videos section on this website and search for it there.

Namaste, David

Enlightenment is not for the “me”

There is nothing personal in Enlightenment. Enlightenment, we can say, is a vast Emptiness, an Impersonal Backdrop that certainly does not destroy the functioning of the personality or ego-structure, or feelings, or bodily functioning; but it is prior to all of that.

The body-mind might get an intimation that Enlightenment has in fact occurred, which is that the subtlest level of the mind has somehow become enlightened about the nature of the presence/non-presence of this Field; that it somehow agrees that It exists. Not agrees in the sense that it believes, or has faith in, the fact that It exists, but that it is utterly reconciled and aligned toward that Field. I don't say in, because nothing enters into It.

It's important to note that the structure -- and this bears repeating -- of the personality remains intact. Everything continues as it was. Nothing changes in the relative. Many of the likes and dislikes that were present before awakening are still present afterwards, unless there was some recognition of some kind of negativity in one's habit-patterns, in which case there might be a quick adjustment, a quick and spontaneous adjustment in behavior.

Phenomena like calmness, peace, even the feeling of no-duality, are all outside of the Enlightened-Field. The personality, the ego-structure, might think it knows only because it feels the wave-like undulations, the pulsations, the quietness and energy and love that happen near that Emptiness. But that Emptiness exists nowhere near the human personality. It's good to understand this completely, because it teaches you to not attach to any form of experience that arises in you. It might be perceived as a letdown. You might feel deflated as the result of knowing this kind of thing, because if it's not for the "me," and it doesn't come to bear on relative existence, then what is this and what's the point of it.

There’s a passionate movement toward the Truth in someone who desires to have It revealed to him; that movement is created by Life Itself. There’s no selfish motive in it. So the notion that Enlightenment can work for you, or you can extract something out of it are foreign to the very process of true awakening. They just don't exist in that spectrum. Of course, it might be inevitable that the ego-mind thinks and can't help but think that there’s something there for it -- and that kind of deluded selfishness is what, in fact, occurs alongside the genuine and spontaneous awakening process that's motivated by Nature. The separate “me” will continue to interpret everything in a strange fashion, only because that's the field in which it has comprehension -- in the field of the “me” versus the object, in duality. So it sees everything as a reflection of what it wants or doesn't want.

But real Enlightenment is something that we don't ever really know except through the feeling of Fulfillment that comes from Its own Realization. It's a Fulfillment that can't be described or experienced any other way, you can't miss It for something else. So it produces Its own unique fulfillment.

And even the human personality has an intuition about this. It senses “the Other”; it senses where it begins and ends. It knows where birth-and-death exist and therefore, by default, it knows what That is. But it never knows what That is, positively. It never positively affirms that Impersonal Consciousness. It's only by virtue of what It is not that you know that It is there and has been Realized. It's what the “me” can't know about it that Enlightens the “me” as to Its Presence.

It's good to hear this kind of information, because it helps the ego-mind to have a hands-off approach when it comes to realizing the Impersonal. Hands off! Just to hear that knowledge will instruct the relative personality: "Oh, yes...," And so, in that way you're guided subtly to a correct approach, a correct posture, in relationship to your own spontaneously occurring sadhana.


Thank you very much for the transcriptions to your videos! I get a lot of joy out of getting to read your information! Even if my phone was faster I would prefer reading. Which is quite a strange thing to say considering how much I use to dislike having to read when I was in school. Ha ha. Again thank you!

By ryan

Not that I don't like watching you talk! I guess I just turned into a reader as I have aged

By ryan